Revised Aravalli Hills Definition: Supreme Court Extends Stay

Supreme Court Extends Stay on Aravalli Hills Verdict Amid Concerns Over Environmental Protection

2 Min Read

 


The Aravalli Range, one of the oldest mountain systems in the world, serves as a vital natural barrier and life-sustaining ecosystem for the National Capital Region (NCR) and the Indo-Gangetic Plains. However, it faces increasing threats from deforestation, mining, grazing, and human encroachment.

- Advertisement -

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court extended the stay on its earlier verdict regarding the definition of the Aravalli Hills, directing that status quo be maintained until further orders.

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, said the interim direction—keeping in abeyance the November 20 judgment that prescribed a revised definition of the Aravalli Hills—would continue to operate.

The court had initially stayed the verdict on December 29, citing the need to resolve “critical ambiguities,” such as whether the 100-metre elevation and 500-metre gap criteria would exclude significant portions of the range from environmental protection.

The bench directed Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for Rajasthan, and amicus curiae K. Parameshwar to suggest, within four weeks, names of environmentalists and scientists with mining expertise. These experts will form a committee to examine all aspects of the issue under the court’s supervision.

The Supreme Court emphasized the need for experts from various fields to ensure comprehensive evaluation. It also noted ongoing illegal mining activities at scattered locations and directed the Rajasthan government to prevent any unlawful extraction, stressing that the law must take its course against offenders. Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj assured the court that the state government would comply.

The top court further instructed all parties to submit a comprehensive note outlining the legal questions involved in the case. The matter has been listed for further hearing in four weeks. (Agencies)


 

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version